Contact
I'm always glad to hear from people who read the site.
If you're interested in talking to me for whatever reason, please feel free to contact me using the Contact form above or directly at lar@wezen-ball.com.
Oh, and don't forget, you can always use the Forums!
Bloguin Baseball Debate
Baseball Bloggers Alliance
Online Flowers
Shop for your flowers online at the Online Flowers shop
Party Bets
Wanna make baseball a tad more exciting? Check out Party Bets. They have some of the largest online sports betting rooms online. Plus you can just play for fun instead of cash.
Sports Interaction
Baseball Fans! Sports Interaction is the best sport betting site on the web to bet on MLB, and if you feel a little adventourous why not try some World Cup betting this year!
|
|
Written by Larry Granillo
|
|
Tuesday, 07 July 2009 05:43 |
The All-Star rosters were announced this past weekend. There are already plenty of people discussing the various merits of the selections, so I thought I'd point out something a little different. We all know that one of the restrictions of the All-Star Game rosters is that, no matter what, there must be at least one representative from each of MLB's thirty ballclubs. This year, ten of the sixty-four named All-Stars are solo representatives, ranging from the no-question-about-it nature of Kansas City's Zack Greinke to the more-questionable Andrew Bailey of Oakland.
Some may call these "obligatory" All-Stars, but I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. They do tend to come from poorly performing teams, though. It may not be the best sign, then, for a team and its fanbase to send only one representative to the All-Star Game many years in a row. If that's happening year after year, then there's probably not a whole lot to root for in those towns.
What teams, then, have had the longest string of only one All-Star Game representative? I decided to take a look at just that. The results may not be the most shocking, but I think there still might be some surprises in there. (It's also rather interesting to see that the Yankees have only had 4 years with only one All-Star selection in the 65 years history of the All-Star Game while the Mets have had twenty.) Teams w/Only One All-Star Game Rep., Most Consecutive Years
1. Kansas City Royals, 10 years (1990 - 1999)
1. Milwaukee Brewers, 10 years (1989 - 1998)
1. Minnesota Twins, 10 years (1978 - 1987)
1. Seattle Mariners, 10 years (1977 - 1986)
5. Detroit Tigers, 9 years (1995 - 2003)
5. San Diego Padres, 9 years (1969 - 1977)
5. Montreal Expos, 9 years (1969 - 1977)
8. Tampa Bay Rays, 8 years (2000 - 2007)
9. Texas Rangers, 7 years (1982 - 1988)
9. Toronto Blue Jays, 7 years (1977 - 1983)
9. Pittsburgh Pirates, 7 years (1949 - 1955) There are a bunch of expansion and near-expansion teams on the list, which does make sense. But that's not really a valid excuse for those 1980s Twins teams or the 1990s Royals or Tigers teams.
This doesn't tell the full story, though. There are a number of examples of teams having two or more multi-year streaks broken up by only one year of having more than one All-Star. For example, between 1947 and 1956, the St. Louis Browns/Baltimore Orioles had only one All-Star in 9 of the 10 years. Expanding the leaderboard to include those instances, the list looks like this:
Teams w/Only One All-Star, Longest Span of Time
1. Kansas City Royals, 17 of 19 years (1990 - 2008)
2. Milwaukee Brewers, 14 of 16 years (1986 - 2001)
3. Pittsburgh Pirates, 13 of 15 years (1994 - 2008)
4. Seattle Mariners, 13 of 15 years (1977 - 1991)
5. Chicago White Sox, 13 of 14 years (1976 - 1989)
6. Detroit Tigers, 10 of 11 years (1995 - 2005)
7. Washington Senators, 10 of 11 years (1961 - 1972) *includes 2 All-Star Games each in 1961 and 1962
8. Baltimore Orioles/St. Louis Browns, 9 of 10 years (1949 - 1956)
9. Philadelphia Phillies, 9 of 10 years (1935 - 1944)
10. Montreal Expos/Washington Nationals, 9 of 12 years (1997 - 2008) However you slice it, this streak that the Royals are on (which extends to 18 of 20 this year with the sole selection of Zack Greinke) is not great for them or their fans. I'm pretty surprised to see the Pirates down at number three on the list, considering their record run of losing seasons. They have had some decent All-Star selections in that time, though, with Brian Giles, Jason Kendall, and Jason Bay.
In the end, this list may not tell us a whole lot that we don't already know - yes, the Brewers, Royals, and Pirates of the last twenty years have had some tough years - but it's still good to have. After all, how else would we remember the weak string of years from those early 1980s Twins or Mariners? For the sake of the fans around the country, though, I hope that the streaks that are currently ongoing in Kansas City and Pittsburgh end soon. It's just good for baseball when the stars are spread around the map.
 |
|
About Me
What's with the name?
"Wezen" is the name of a star in the constellation Canis Major ("The Great Dog"). It's the star that marks the, ahem, point where the dog's tail meets its hindlegs. It's a name that I've always liked the sound of and so I used it around the internet.
When I started this blog, I didn't expect to put a lot of time into it, so I just gave it the first name I could think of. Now I like it, no matter how strange it may sound, and I just love how the new banner and background make use of it.
What's the site about?
There is no real, overriding philosophy guiding the posts here at Wezen-Ball.com. Instead, it's just a place for me to write about what I find interesting in the baseball world. Sometimes that means it'll be original statistical research that I've been working on or some other opinions that I might have. Usually, though, I'll be writing about how a certain player, team, or event from the past was viewed through contemporary accounts.
I do this mostly through the use of my collection of annual baseball preview magazines or other resources available online. So, whether it's looking back to see if Jim Rice was truly "feared"by the people who saw him play, or it's looking back to see how Greg Maddux was viewed early in his career, or if it's just looking back to see what people predicted baseball would be like in the year 2000 (from 1981), you'll find it here.
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics. 
The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.
The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.
The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account! 