Contact
I'm always glad to hear from people who read the site.
If you're interested in talking to me for whatever reason, please feel free to contact me using the Contact form above or directly at lar@wezen-ball.com.
Oh, and don't forget, you can always use the Forums!
Bloguin Baseball Debate
Baseball Bloggers Alliance
Online Flowers Shop for your flowers online at the Online Flowers shop
Party Bets Wanna make baseball a tad more exciting? Check out Party Bets. They have some of the largest online sports betting rooms online. Plus you can just play for fun instead of cash.
Sports Interaction Baseball Fans! Sports Interaction is the best sport betting site on the web to bet on MLB, and if you feel a little adventourous why not try some World Cup betting this year!
|
|
Written by Larry Granillo
|
|
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 14:35 |
|
It's the afternoon of December 23. For some reason, I don't think many people will be reading blogs all that much the rest of the week. But will I let that stop me from posting something interesting? Never.
In a nice long discussion over at BBTF yesterday about Albert Pujols' current place on the greatest players of all-time list - does he belong in the top 10 after only nine years? how do we know he won't spend the next ten years in a body cast? Frank Thomas! - commenter Joe C. said this (in reply to zonk):
Maybe - but it didn't drag his peers down... Or - to put it this way - if we only took the first 9 seasons of what I'm saying are his peers, would Pujols stack up? I think so.
That's not the right comparison to make, IMO. You should (not to say you should actually do this) be comparing Pujols to others' best first nine seasons. Yeah, all of the guys who are in the top 10 all-time in OPS+ or whatever who aren't active all maintained that level, sure - but how many guys had those rates at their peak, and were brought down (relatively speaking) by their decline phase?
I don't know the answer, just throwing that out there.
That intrigued me. Who are the players with the best nine-year starts to their careers, and how well did they keep it up? Who are the players who plummeted the most?
In Joe C.'s question, he seems to be wondering about a player's standing on the all-time charts, like OPS+. It's a good question, but not one that I think I can realistically answer. However, if we instead decide to rank players using Wins Above Replacement at (and after) their first nine-years, it becomes very answerable and should be a fair compromise - after all, what's the good of a stat that encompasses a player's total worth if we don't use it?
The only real problem I came across when trying to gather this data was deciding what counted as someone's ninth season. Do you count from the season that he made his debut, or when he became a full-time player? And what do you consider a full-time player? What about partial seasons after that "first" season, where he might only play in 25 or 30 games due to injury or something - do those count towards the nine seasons? I decided to count the first "full-season" as season #1, and then any seasons after that as season #2 or #3, and so on, regardless of games played. In Thomas' case, he played in 60 games in 1990 and then averaged 146 games played from 1991 to 1999. His first year, then, was 1991 (the cut-off for a "full season" was 81 games). For someone like Hank Greenberg, though, who had 12-game and 19-game seasons in the '30s, all of his seasons after his first full season were counted toward the nine-season limit, putting his ninth season at 1941. Any value that the player may have added in those initial partial seasons is included, however.
So who are the leaders in WAR after their ninth season? Here's the list (hitters only, using Rally's Historic WAR Database):
(click "Read More" to continue reading)
Top Hitters' WAR, First 9 Seasons 1. Babe Ruth (1926) - 96.8 WAR 2. Ted Williams (1950) - 79.7 **3. Albert Pujols (2009) - 76.6 4. Lou Gehrig (1933) - 76.2 4. Rogers Hornsby (1924) - 76.2 6. Eddie Collins (1916) - 74.9 7. Stan Musial (1951) - 74.3 8. Ty Cobb (1914) - 73.7 9. Tris Speaker (1917) - 72.6 10. Mickey Mantle (1959) - 72.1 11. Honus Wagner (1906) - 71.5
Babe Ruth will always be a problem because of those first few years as a pitcher. His first "full season", according to this, is 1918, though he was a pitcher for 3 years before that. Since we're only looking at hitters here and we've found his first full season as a hitter, it should be okay. As for the list itself, we see pretty clearly just how elite Pujols' company is. Only Babe Ruth and Ted Williams provided more value in their first nine seasons as hitters than Pujols, and the great Lou Gehrig and Rogers Hornsby as right behind him. If you ever had any doubt about how special Pujols has been this decade, I don't think you can anymore.
But how did everybody fare after that ninth season? Just eyeballing that list, it doesn't seem like anyone plummeted too far after reaching such high peaks early. And that's true, as you can see in the list below:
Total WAR, 10th+ Season Babe Ruth: 9 seasons, 75.2 WAR (8.4 WAR/season) Ted Williams: 10 s., 45.6 (4.6) Lou Gehrig: 6 s., 42.2 (7) Rogers Hornsby: 13 s., 51.6 (4) Eddie Collins: 14 s., 51.8 (3.7) Stan Musial: 12 s., 53.5 (4.5) Ty Cobb: 14 s., 85.7 (6.1) Tris Speaker: 11 s., 60.4 (5.5) Mickey Mantle: 9 s., 48.1 (5.3) Honus Wagner: 11 s., 63 (5.7)
Of that top 10, only Eddie Collins (and maybe Rogers Hornsby) could be said to have degraded much after the ninth season. But, at 3.7 WAR/season from his 10th through 23rd seasons, it's hard to complain too much.
So is that it? Can we just consider Pujols to be well on his way to being a top-5 all-time player? Not so fast. If we just look at these top players and no one else, then we're doing the same thing Joe C. was warning about in his initial comment. We need to see some examples of players who did fall from grace, so to speak, after their ninth season. That might help give us an idea of how often this happens. Here then is a list of all players who put up 50+ WAR in their first 9 seasons and then averaged less than 3.5 WAR/season over the rest of their career:
Name
|
9th Year |
WAR First 9 |
Seasons Post 9 |
WAR Post 9 |
WAR/Yr Post 9 |
| Cap Anson |
1888 |
70.3 |
9 |
29.2 |
3.2 |
| Jimmie Foxx |
1936 |
66.8 |
8 |
27.3 |
3.4 |
| Wade Boggs |
1990 |
63.3 |
9 |
25.7 |
2.9 |
| Arky Vaughan |
1940 |
59.7 |
5 |
15.9 |
3.2 |
| Jeff Bagwell |
1999 |
59.6 |
6 |
20.3 |
3.4 |
| Duke Snider |
1957 |
57.9 |
7 |
9.6 |
1.4 |
| Ken Griffey |
1997 |
57.8 |
12 |
21.5 |
1.8 |
| Johnny Mize |
1947 |
57.5 |
6 |
12.7 |
2.1 |
| Ernie Banks |
1962 |
57.4 |
9 |
7 |
0.8 |
| Frank Baker |
1918 |
56.7 |
3 |
7 |
2.3 |
| Cal Ripken |
1990 |
54.8 |
11 |
35.1 |
3.2 |
| Reggie Jackson |
1976 |
54.8 |
11 |
19.8 |
1.8 |
| Dick Allen |
1972 |
54.8 |
5 |
6.4 |
1.3 |
| Frank Thomas |
1999 |
54.3 |
9 |
21.6 |
2.4 |
| Frankie Frisch |
1928 |
53.4 |
9 |
21.4 |
2.4 |
| George Brett |
1982 |
53.1 |
11 |
31.9 |
2.9 |
| Mike Piazza |
2001 |
52.6 |
6 |
6.5 |
1.1 |
| Johnny Bench |
1976 |
52.5 |
7 |
18.8 |
2.7 |
| Sal Bando |
1976 |
52.5 |
5 |
8.1 |
1.6 |
| Andruw Jones |
2005 |
51.9 |
4 |
6.5 |
1.6 |
| Paul Waner |
1934 |
51 |
11 |
22.8 |
2.1 |
| Elmer Flick |
1906 |
50.9 |
4 |
5.8 |
1.4 |
| Lou Boudreau |
1948 |
50.9 |
4 |
5.1 |
1.3 |
Not all of those names are remembered as all-time greats, but there are plenty of Hall of Famers on that list. My eye is immediately drawn to a few, though: Duke Snider, Ken Griffey, Johnny Mize, Reggie Jackson, and especially Ernie Banks all ended their careers on incredible downturns (Piazza too, but, as a catcher, he's a much tougher comparison). That doesn't make any of them any lesser of a Hall of Famer, and it doesn't directly say anything about Pujols (especially since few, if any, could be said to have similar careers or body types to Pujols). But it does serve as a strong reminder that any player, no matter how healthy or great their first nine seasons are, can fall prey to injuries or aging. Those of us who are genuinely thrilled and thankful to be witnessing perhaps one of the greatest players of all-time need to temper that excitement some as Pujols enters his 30s. One never knows what will happen over the next 10-12 years.
See the full spreadsheet of players who earned 45 or more WAR in their first 9 seasons and how they fared the rest of their career.
 |
|
About Me
What's with the name? "Wezen" is the name of a star in the constellation Canis Major ("The Great Dog"). It's the star that marks the, ahem, point where the dog's tail meets its hindlegs. It's a name that I've always liked the sound of and so I used it around the internet.
When I started this blog, I didn't expect to put a lot of time into it, so I just gave it the first name I could think of. Now I like it, no matter how strange it may sound, and I just love how the new banner and background make use of it.
What's the site about? There is no real, overriding philosophy guiding the posts here at Wezen-Ball.com. Instead, it's just a place for me to write about what I find interesting in the baseball world. Sometimes that means it'll be original statistical research that I've been working on or some other opinions that I might have. Usually, though, I'll be writing about how a certain player, team, or event from the past was viewed through contemporary accounts.
I do this mostly through the use of my collection of annual baseball preview magazines or other resources available online. So, whether it's looking back to see if Jim Rice was truly "feared"by the people who saw him play, or it's looking back to see how Greg Maddux was viewed early in his career, or if it's just looking back to see what people predicted baseball would be like in the year 2000 (from 1981), you'll find it here.
|